This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Importance tag
editI've tagged this because the article fails to show how this site meets WP:WEB. Since it was created today, I'm going to give it some time to develop, but if WP:WEB criteria isn't met, this should go to AfD.--Isotope23 17:08, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
As of today there are links to articles on Salon.com and China Central Television covering chinadialogue and a mention in the text of an interview given by editor Isabel Hilton to BBC Radio 4's Talking Politics show.
Can the Importance tag now be removed? Xue hanyu 16:35, 1 February 2007 (UTC)Xue hanyu
Currently researching
editI'm currently looking for media coverage in the UK and abroad of this site to justify it's inclusion as a wikipedia entry.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Xue hanyu (talk • contribs)
- Comment, it might help to read WP:WEB to see what inclusion criteria need to be met. Also, please sign your comments on talk pages with --~~~~ so it is clear who is making a comment. Thanks!--Isotope23 13:25, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
I've added in external links, a republished article from chinadialogue on allAfrica.com, a large and widely-respected African news portal, who credit chinadialogue as a news source. SL
- I removed that link because it was inaccessible without a subscription and doesn't really source anything. I removed several other links that were auxillary to Chinadialogue but do not actually reference it. Links should actually have mention of Chinadialogue.--Isotope23 17:44, 28 November 2006 (UTC)