This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This article was marred by bad references, for years. The original reference was malformed, and unrecoverable.
The external links section contains references to other wikis. Well, we don't generally reference other wikis, on the grounds they are no more reliable than the wikipedia. But maybe, since then, the wikipedia proved so good some genuine RS started using wikipedia technology. So I didn't remove them, yet. If I return here, in a reasonable period of time, and no consensus has arisen to keep them, I am removing them.
Oh, Chinamax and Valemax are synonyms -- that is what RS say, so I removed the separate and inadequateoy referenced valemax subsection ... Geo Swan (talk) 03:31, 17 December 2016 (UTC)Reply
There is a Valemax article. The way I read the two articles, Chinamax is a size standard (akin to Panamax etc only larger); Valemax is the class of ships designed by Vale S.A. which meet the Chinamax standard. So, by definition, all Valemax ships are Chinamax ships, but not all Chinamax standard ships are necessarily Valemax class. --Scott DavisTalk00:14, 6 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
