This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Latest comment: 6 months ago11 comments2 people in discussion
Committee of China's Conference for the Defense of World Peace was the predecessor organization of the Chinese People's Association for Friendship with Foreign Countries and part of the subsequent merger. Please do not remove history to fulfill your anti-China political agenda. TinaLees-Jones (talk) 14:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
I try to understand your political activities with the best of intentions, but the obvious anti-Chinese malice that exists in all the edits about you and the objective historical presentation by deleting entries. There are many reports about you on google, I hope you love your own feathers. TinaLees-Jones (talk) 14:18, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
I had already made my claim on the talk page before you deleted it, you should have properly replied to that claim first before maliciously deleting it. Your anti-Chinese stance is offensive. TinaLees-Jones (talk) 14:21, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
There are already four sources within that paragraph to support the information, and the combined information is clearly explained in subsequent paragraphs. TinaLees-Jones (talk) 14:22, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
The first paragraph should clearly state that it is a successor to said organization and have WP:RSes to back up such a statement. At present, none of that is there. - Amigao (talk) 14:25, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
In other words, the removed paragraph does not logically connect with the rest of the History section. There should be some phrasing backed up with a specific WP:RS that states that it is a successor organization. - Amigao (talk) 14:33, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply