Talk:Chinese hamster ovary cell

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Definition is self-referential

Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The definition given in the first line is self-referential: "Chinese Hamster Ovary cells (CHO cells) are a cell line derived from Chinese Hamster ovary cells." — Paul G 07:11, 22 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

How about "Chinese Hamster Ovary cells (CHO cells) are a cell line derived from the cells of Chinese Hamster ovaries." :-) Axl 21:49, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Someone has fixed it.Rod57 (talk) 12:51, 18 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

copyright?

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

looks like part of this is a direct copy from : [1] which is a apge with copyright Xtothel (talk) 08:32, 18 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Chinese Hamster History

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello all! It seems that much of the history on this page is actually the history of the Chinese Hamster in research, rather than the history of the CHO cell. Perhaps we could move the hamster stuff to Chinese hamster and start the history section of the CHO article with a short sentence like "the Chinese hamster had been used as a research animal since blah blah blah..." and then jump into the CHO cell stuff? Thoughts?Ajpolino (talk) 06:45, 28 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chinese hamster ovary cell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131213154144/http://pef.aibn.uq.edu.au/wordpress/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/Support/Mammalian/Literature/Recombinant_Protein_Therapeutics_from_CHO_Cells-20_years_and_counting_Jayapal.pdf to http://pef.aibn.uq.edu.au/wordpress/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/Support/Mammalian/Literature/Recombinant_Protein_Therapeutics_from_CHO_Cells-20_years_and_counting_Jayapal.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:50, 5 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic