 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Amazing Discoveries
editThe items conatained about this subject is highly recommended to teach in our public and private schools for informational purposes only. T. Riley EHS. 3/4/2009 —Preceding unsigned comment added by EHS4950 (talk • contribs) 17:27, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Speculative ref
edit@Boghog: deleted a reference and inserted the following speculative references instead:
Rosenberg MJ, Feldblum PJ, Marshall EG (Jul 1987). "Occupational influences on reproduction: a review of recent literature". Journal of Occupational Medicine. 29 (7): 584–91. doi:10.4103/0975-7406.106559. PMID 3612335.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
If it is to be included in the article an url is needed at the minimum. Is this some sophisticated vandalism? RhinoMind (talk) 11:45, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry about that. The problem was before my edit, the PMC id was miss-assigned as the PMID. The script I was using to standardize the citations assumes that the value of the PMID is correct. I have included the correct PMID in this edit. Also please note that if
|pmc=is assigned, it automatically links the article title to PMC, so that the|url=becomes redundant. Boghog (talk) 13:05, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
- Ah, that should explain a few things. But it is a completely different article, with another title? And it might even be relevant, eventhough it is from the 1980s. I haven't read it though and are not aware if it holds any useful information to add. RhinoMind (talk) 13:15, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, the two articles are completely unrelated and as far as I can tell, PMID 3612335 has zero relevance to the subject of chitinase. My original edit was in error. Again, sorry about that. Boghog (talk) 14:28, 30 December 2015 (UTC)