Talk:Chittaranjan Locomotive Works
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Name spelling
editI am not able to understand why this page was redirected from Chittaranjan Locomotive Works to Chittranjan Locomotive Works. The former spelling is officially used. Is there a way to go back? -- P.K.Niyogi 03:55, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, see the instructions for redirections. I am not an expert but I had the same problem with another article two days ago.- Pernambuco 23:03, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- The article has now been moved to the name Chittaranjan Locomotive Works. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 08:37, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:22, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:07, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Work to be done
editMost of this article seems to rely on documentation from when the site was first founded and shortly after. Need some more up to date information and a lot of rewriting. -TGWZoldorf (talk) 19:16, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Township Information
editThere is a lot of information in the article that is relating to the township nearby and does not seem connected to the locomotive works. I have removed some of this unnecessary information from the article but would also propose cutting back the township of heading of the article. Grateful for views from more experienced editors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asimoth (talk • contribs) 08:23, 26 January 2021 (UTC)