Talk:Chlorarachniophyte

Protista Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Protista, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of protists and protistology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ProtistaWikipedia:WikiProject ProtistaTemplate:WikiProject ProtistaProtista articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Algae Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Algae, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the photosynthetic organisms commonly called algae and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AlgaeWikipedia:WikiProject AlgaeTemplate:WikiProject AlgaeAlgae articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Marine life (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marine life, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Marine lifeWikipedia:WikiProject Marine lifeTemplate:WikiProject Marine lifeMarine life articles

Microbiology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrobiologyWikipedia:WikiProject MicrobiologyTemplate:WikiProject MicrobiologyMicrobiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

COMMENTS

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Was the origin of the chlorarachniophyte chloroplast really from a euglenoid? This would imply that there was another symbiosis after the incorporation of a chlorophyte into a euglenoid. Was there not a common ancestor? The referenced article seems to imply so:

Rhizaria and Excavata (jointly cabozoa) are probably sisters if the formerly green algal plastid of euglenoids and chlorarachneans (Cercozoa) was enslaved in a single event in their common ancestor.

It also talks about how it can't be proven that there wasn't two independent symbiosis events; nowhere (that I can see) does it mention that euglenoid symbiosis was prior to a further chlorarachnian symbiosis. I think I'm going to remove this for just now until that's clarified.

- Dackerts (talk) 17:37, 11 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Removing it is fine. You can also add it in as C-S's hypothesis if it is supported elsewhere and it's one where he hasn't changed it. --Kleopatra (talk) 18:14, 11 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Chlorarachniophyte. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110720054024/http://comenius.susqu.edu/bi/202/RHIZARIA/CERCOZOAE/Chlorarachniophyta/default.htm to http://comenius.susqu.edu/bi/202/RHIZARIA/CERCOZOAE/Chlorarachniophyta/default.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:32, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic