Talk:Chocolate Factory

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chocolate Factory article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

R&B and Soul Music High‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hip hop Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Highly offensive track list

I have the R Kelly Chocolate Factory album and i can honestly say that this is not the track list of this album. This is highly offensive and damages my faith and the credibility of Wikipedia. Please alter or remove

Assessment comment

Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Chocolate Factory/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

Article requirements:

Y A relatively complete infobox
Y Cover art in the infobox
Y A lead section giving an overview of the album

At least one section of informative prose other than lead
A track listing (for "start" class), containing track lengths & composers (for "B" class)

Y A list of personnel (specific band members (for "start" class), guest musicians and technical (for "B" class)

Categorisation at least by artist and year

While it does include some prose other than the lead, the majority of that section is quotes, which makes it questionable as "a section of informative prose". Contributors may wish to look at WP:ALBUM for some additional ideas on prose to incorporate. There are a long list of contributors, including musicians and technical personnel, =amg&sql=10:j9fuxqyaldje~T2 here, who are not included in the personnel listing. Also, There are no track lengths. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 02:42, 31 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

The above concerns have been address. I concur with the reassessment of "B", although I have communicated to the editor who reassessed that it is inappropriate to assess articles to which one has contributed. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 01:40, 9 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

To meet the more rigorous criteria of the revised B class, this article needs to be brought more in line with Wikipedia's standards by improving logical "flow" of the article. It would help to incorporate the review quotes into textual presentation rather than having them stand alone as quotes. In addition, more information might be incorporated as suggested at WP:ALBUM.

As a question, is personnel complete? Based on =amg&sql=10:j9fuxqyaldje~T2 this, it seems not, though knowing Allmusic i wouldn't be surprised if they weren't combining reissues as well as the original release.

Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Assessment for additional information on B class in album articles. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 22:09, 19 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 22:09, 19 July 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 11:35, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Chocolate Factory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://ca.music.yahoo.com/read/review/12026923
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cduniverse.com/search/xx/music/pid/5002401/a/Chocolate+Factory.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120313211501/http://www.bpi.co.uk/certifiedawards/search.aspx to http://www.bpi.co.uk/certifiedawards/search.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:41, 22 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chocolate Factory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cduniverse.com/search/xx/music/pid/5002401/a/Chocolate+Factory.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091217012729/http://blog.rhapsody.com/2009/12/bestrbalbums.html to http://blog.rhapsody.com/2009/12/bestrbalbums.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:19, 7 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic