Talk:Chocolate crackles

Old comments

Is the title meant to be plural? Enochlau 00:47, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Kellogs refers to the dish in plural form. I always have as well for that matter. -- Longhair 20:42, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

I assume Australian "Rice Bubbles" are similar to, if not identical to, "Rice Krispies" in the US.Richardpaulhall (talk) 07:46, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Chocolate Crackles Australian?

Is this recipe really an Australian invention? Thought it was something taken from Kellog's cereal packets, and that that is a US company? Format (talk) 18:42, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Oops should have checked first - some hints usggest it might be Australian in origin? [1] Interesting. Format (talk) 18:50, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Elsewhere

Checking chocolate "rice krispies" coconut cocoa finds many similar results around the world with various names.LeadSongDog (talk) 05:00, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Has something changed in the ingredients of chocolate crackles?

When I was a child and I made chocolate crackles, I am sure they looked like the rice bubbles were in dark chocolate. I just made them for my grandson's birthday and they were so pale! Has the strength of cocoa changed? This is the only thing I can think of that might make this difference. All of the ingredients have remained identical over the years. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.181.58.210 (talk) 01:36, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

@131.181.58.210: Not sure. Were they a similar colour to the image in the article? Also, did you check the first known recipe, from the Women's Weekly? Thanks, Jjamesryan (talk | contribs) 10:26, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chocolate crackles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724213049/http://womansday.ninemsn.com.au/food/foodfeatures/993798/copha to http://womansday.ninemsn.com.au/food/foodfeatures/993798/copha

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:42, 5 August 2017 (UTC)