Talk:Choctaw in the American Civil War
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Choctaw in the American Civil War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090202121021/http://www.choctawnation.com/History/index.cfm?fuseaction=HArticle&HArticleID=14 to http://www.choctawnation.com/History/index.cfm?fuseaction=HArticle&HArticleID=14
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:11, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Jack Amos infobox
editI deleted the infobox for Jack Amos again. I have no issue with the picture being used as main picture showing him as an example of the Choctaw during the war. Neither with him being included in the article. But the article itself is not about Amos. It is about a group of people which means using the infobox military person with one single person and his specific data as the main infobox for this article is missleading and out of place. ...GELongstreet (talk) 00:57, 31 December 2017 (UTC)