This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Latest comment: 5 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The references cited include The Backyard Lumberjack, a popular book for the homeowner market that, despite whatever its other merits, recommends a bad felling technique and for that reason alone shouldn't be cited in any context. Surely there is a better reference to replace it with, and it probably should be a professional or historical book, not one written for the popular market. The "Further Reading" section is just...weird. Books on building log homes, cowboy poetry, Marxism, growing up in the country, a New York genealogy book published by Authorhouse, and something in German that as best I can gather is about "ecoterrorism". Everything but logging. I've seen some oddball coatracking on Wiki before but this is a truly strange one. 184.19.130.96 (talk) 01:51, 28 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
Agreed, titles in further reading are unrelated to the topic at hand. As there has been no reply in defense of it in the eleven years since your comment, I am cleaning it up. Fathomharvill (talk) 05:32, 24 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
