Talk:Cholecystostomy
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Cholecystostomy.
|
Wiki Education assignment: 2023-24 WikiMed Directed Studies
edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 October 2023 and 18 November 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tacobellbeanburrito (article contribs). Peer reviewers: StudentDoctorDG, Justiceforryuji.
— Assignment last updated by Ewingdo 15:23, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Peer review
editLead
- good lead, reflects the content appropriately
Content
- the content is good, and I think the information that the article contains is helpful for anyone looking to gain a detailed overview on cholecystostomy. The structure is written in a neutral, informative tone which will be beneficial to the Wikipedia database.
- I have made minor grammar corrections and I have used bulleted lists to make the readability easier. I suggest that we keep these changes moving forward, even with the addition of new material.
Sources and References
- all content is backed with clear and reliable resources currently. More sources can be added in the future as seen necessary with the addition of new information. The links work good.
Images
- there are currently no images on the page.
Overall impressions
- I think the new content that has been added has improved the available information on cholecystostomy substantially. We are now introduced to information regarding the indications and contraindications to this procedure while also learning about the procedure. The article quality has been improved substantially. The biggest strength to the information added at this point seems to be that the citations back the information precisely. The only improvement to suggest at this point is adding additional content as time allows.