Talk:Chopped and screwed

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Triaser in topic Unreliable source usage

Redirect problems

edit

There is a show on food network called Chopped. I came here looking for that. Could we not have the term "chopped" lead here as a redirect? I would do it myself but I don't know how. I suggest that we make a disambiguation page. Chopped can refer to Chopped and screwed, and to the Food Network show Chopped. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.237.213.205 (talk) 18:25, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quotes

edit

Could someone reference the quotes so that they do not have to be deleted? --Topspinslams (talk) 01:54, 13 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Cleanup

edit

I cleaned up a lot of the language, but haven't verified any of the information or wikified the page format. I have also deleted an inappropriate comment here on the discussion page. Eine 11:35, 24 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

I did a bit of wikification, mostly sectioning. Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject! JubalHarshaw 14:07, 6 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Many albums are dragged and chopped and slowed and chopped among various other "kinds" of alerations. Are these the same as Screwed and Chopped?

Black Eyed Peas and Transplants

edit

They are certainly within a subgenre of "rap." Screwed and Chopped country or alt. rock would be more notable —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rockingbeat (talkcontribs) 15:13, 8 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Audio Samples?

edit

...For examples of what music in this genre sound like.

-- Mik 23:33, 4 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

I don't think I've ever seen that type of thing on WP, probably due to copyright issues. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eli lilly (talkcontribs) 17:17, 8 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
The Brandenburg concertos article has an example. We could add a sample of music, we just need to be sure to follow these rules. Sсοττ5834talk 17:49, 8 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Screwed and Chopped Albums

edit

Someone should make a list. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.151.205.221 (talk) 04:34, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

I think based on the fact most albums that would fall under this category are remixes of existing albums, and therefore there is a potentially infinite number of albums.

edit

The main reference link for "Chopped and Screwed: A History" from MTV2 is now a 404 page. This seems problematic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Klangfarben (talkcontribs) 20:09, 13 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chopped and screwed. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:51, 23 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in Chopped and screwed

edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Chopped and screwed's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "nyt":

  • From Graffiti: Shenon, Philip (8 May 1994). "Singapore Swings; Michael Fay's Torture's Over; Watch for the Docudrama". New York Times. Retrieved 2010-04-02.
  • From Atlanta hip hop: John Caramanica, "Gucci Mane, No Holds Barred ", New York Times, December 11, 2009
  • From Screwed Up Click: Sanneh, Kelefa (2007-05-27). "A Hip-Hop Hurricane and Other Phenomena". The New York Times. Retrieved 2008-09-07.
  • From DJ Screw: Strauss, Neil. "THE POP LIFE; Rap Is Slower Around Houston". The New York Times. Retrieved 13 April 2017.
  • From Southern hip hop: "John Caramanica, "Gucci Mane, No Holds Barred ", ''New York Times'', December 11, 2009". Nytimes.com. December 13, 2009. Retrieved August 9, 2012.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 01:03, 14 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chopped and screwed. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:21, 5 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Unreliable source usage

edit

Even though the content of this article is interesting and fascinating to read, there is a big problem with the cited sources.

for example: source 2 is a website without date, author nor the reference.

Source 3 is just a blog.

Source 4 can't be opened

Source 5 is a blog

I suggest all this source be replaced with credible and reliable sources. Triaser (talk) 14:54, 1 April 2019 (UTC)Reply