Talk:Chordoma

Medicine: Dermatology / Pathology Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Dermatology task force.
	This article is supported by the Pathology task force.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Chordoma.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

External links

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Wikipedia's external links policy and the specific guidelines for medicine-related articles do not permit the inclusion of external links to non-encyclopedic material, particularly including internet chat boards and e-mail discussion groups. Because I realize that most normal editors haven't spent much time with these policies, please let me provide specific information from the guidelines:

This page, which applies to all articles in the entire encyclopedia, says that links "to social networking sites (such as MySpace or Fan sites), discussion forums/groups (such as Yahoo! Groups), USENET newsgroups or e-mail lists" are to be avoided.

This page deprecates ""helpful" external links, such as forums, self-help groups and local charities."

This medical-specific page reinforces the pan-Wiki rules, with a note that "All links must meet Wikipedia's external links guidelines, which in particular exclude discussion forums."

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and while it may occasionally be useful to patients or their families, it is not a web directory for support groups. Please do not re-insert links that do not conform to the standard rules. Any editor, BTW, is welcome to read all of the rules and perform an "audit" in the remaining links. Thanks, WhatamIdoing (talk) 06:16, 2 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

ABCNews article on first 3D printed vertebra to replace resected veterbra and space where tumor was

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Here's a news article on a world first operation to use a 3D printed vertebra on a chordoma patient.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-02-22/tumour-patient-gets-worlds-first-3d-printed-vertebrae/7183132
Is this a suitable link for wikipedia, or should one wait another year for the peer reviewed journal article?
Salbayeng (talk) 07:24, 16 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Dead link for images

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi This link is dead : Images of Chordoma - mostly radiological (CT and MRI scans), one autopsy image .

It points to here, http://rad.usuhs.edu/medpix/medpix.html ,
see https://www.usuhs.edu/rad/medpix but all the images have moved to "medpix" https://medpix.nlm.nih.gov/home , but the NIH doesn't have a search facility yet.
This search result shows a lot of chordoma images, but a bit scattered. https://openi.nlm.nih.gov/gridquery.php?q=chordoma
Ok Having looked more at that web site, it would seem worth including as an external reference, as you get case details by hovering over each image. Salbayeng (talk) 07:54, 16 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic