Talk:Chris Candido Memorial Tag Team Tournament
Chris Candido Memorial Tag Team Tournament has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 11, 2014. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chris Candido Memorial Tag Team Tournament article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from Chris Candido Memorial Tag Team Tournament appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 January 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Chris Candido Memorial Tag Team Tournament/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: ChrisGualtieri (talk · contribs) 16:37, 4 January 2014 (UTC) I'll take this one. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 16:37, 4 January 2014 (UTC) Good Article Checklist
- Well-written -the prose is clear and concise, respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct; and it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
- Verifiable with no original research: it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline; it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines; and it contains no original research.
- Broad in its coverage: it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
- Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each.
- Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
- Illustrated, if possible, by images: images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
Good Article review progress box
|
- Disambig links: OK
- Reference check:OK
Comments: This article has a few issues.
- "The tournament was well received overall." - you mean "well-received"
- Fixed
- Dates August 16, 2005 – August 16, 2005 - Only needs one date. Please fix.
- Due to template, it requires a start and finish date. I'd have to leave one off and not sure how that would work.
- TNA editor Bill Banks' in his "Bank Shot" column - why do we need the name of his column?
- Fixed
- "onImpact!" spacing
- From the copy and paste, fixed.
- " Sabin left the ring after this due to an injury." Please expand and note that this was not scripted - given the nature of the event these sorts of things need to be highlighted and have some form of announcement to prevent confusion.
- Fixed
- "Chris Sabin received a broken jaw as a result of a kick from Shelley during the final round." - Choppy sentences and prose.
- Fixed
- "He suffered a back injury, but ended up appearing at the PWG show that Sabin was forced to miss." - Intentional, scripted, cite please. (even if it is right below)
- Fixed
- "Sean Waltman (pictured) missed TNA's Unbreakable pay-per-viewevent." and its image are not really relevant to this article. Please remove it.
- I disagree. Waltman won the tournament and the whole tournament was to honor Candido and to become number-one contender to the tag team titles technically. Waltman missed the match he won. I think it is very relevant.
- "TNA management were very upset with Sean Waltman after he failed to participate in the Four Way Elimination Tag Team match. This was due to him being one-half of the winners of the Chris Candido Memorial Tag Team Tournament.[21]Waltman was in Orlando and was dressed to compete, but did not arrive in time to participate in his match.[22] He was not used again by TNA until January 15, 2006 when he appeared at their Final Resolution PPV event.[23]" - Is copied text from the other article. Please fix the prose. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 06:28, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- Actually, this is the original as I wrote this one first. I wrote Unbreakable and this at the same time. Re-done.
Several issues holding this back. Otherwise, not too bad. Please fix it and I should be able to pass it. Placing it on hold now. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 06:28, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review, I hope I have fixed the issues.--WillC 18:25, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- Passed. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 05:00, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chris Candido Memorial Tag Team Tournament. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6LDla2zy5?url=http%3A%2F%2Fentertainment.howstuffworks.com%2Fpro-wrestling.htm to http://entertainment.howstuffworks.com/pro-wrestling.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:14, 23 November 2016 (UTC)