Talk:Chris Kelly (entrepreneur)

NPOV noticeboard

I put a mention of this article on the BLP noticeboard here. Becritical (talk) 20:23, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

While I support Becritical's edit here, it is unfortunate that there is good information and good sourcing in what is removed. To move information from articles to Wikipedia, follow WP:BLP and make sure sources meet WP:RS. The removal is not about the criticism; this is about preventing the insertion unnecessary bias, interpretation, and WP:OR into published statements. Blue Rasberry 20:56, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Right, note the first removal "Kelly was also responsible for exposing minors to sex offenders while at Facebook. " I'm not sure what some of the parts of the section you put back in actually have to do with Kelly or why it would belong... that was written by his enemies to try to tie him to sex offenders. Becritical (talk) 21:04, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

I reviewed the content, and removed most of it, not because it was a BLP violation, but because it was unclear how it related to Kelly rather than Facebook itself. What was his role? Becritical (talk) 21:12, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Becritical, he was the chief privacy officer of Facebook, with ultimate authority over privacy issues. I don't mind if some of the tone is changed, I'll admit that I'm something of a privacy advocate, however his job was to review the privacy issues for Facebook, and thus, it is relevant. --76.14.71.109 (talk) 21:42, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Facebook Career

I have tried to include as much information as possible re his role at Facebook. As Chief Privacy Officer, he had ultimate authority over all privacy issues. I have emphasized his role, but as you can see from the Times Online story, he was the public face of Facebook on privacy and the protection of minors. Thus, it is noteworty. Further information could be included, but at some point, it simply becomes repetitive. --76.14.71.109 (talk) 21:39, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

You made it clear what his role was, so it is better now. Becritical (talk) 21:43, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, I appreciate the feedback via the talk page. I find it very helpful to communicate about these issues here rather than using the article page. Thank you. --76.14.71.109 (talk) 21:45, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

I had to remove part of it, specifically the section dealing with the New York class action suit. The text made substantial statements that could not be supported by the source. The timeline wasn't clear in the source, and no statement as to a cause-and-effect relationship can be supported by the source.—Kww(talk) 21:52, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks Becritical (talk) 23:37, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

I added an additional source that makes the timeline clear and made the timeline more clear. The CNET source goes specifically through the timeline, blow by blow. The source includes a quote by Kelly stating that it was an investigation that became a cooperative effort and that they had slipped up.--76.21.100.98 (talk) 15:44, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Added in the parts where Andrew Cuomo said the investigation came to a "successful conclusion" and praised Facebook's cooperation. Figured the resolution of the issue was important for context and such. Dembonesdembones (talk) 16:17, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Deleted the line that said Kelly helped create & promote the Beacon program. There was no citation to back up that assertion. ELeigh5 (talk) 18:02, 29 May 2010 (UTC)ELeigh5

ELeigh, he was the Chief Privacy officer of Facebook. There are (were) links of Kelly promoting the program and dealing with the privacy fallout afterward. After looking it up, I found Congressional testimony with him discussing Beacon, and have added that link.--LAbaseballFan (talk) 04:43, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

LAbaseballFan, yes, he was the Chief Privacy office at Facebook. And, yes, there is congressional testimony with Chris Kelly discussing Beacon. However, the previous version asserted that he was solely responsible for Beacon - he was not - and solely responsibly for promoting - he was not- was misleading readers, so I took it down. You right that there is controversy about that program and that he did say "they messed up" but Facebook also had an opt-out/opt-in component of Beacon, which I had tried to included that wasn't being included earlier. The Beacon problem was more complex than earlier versions described on this Chris Kelly page. -- Eleigh5 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:52, 3 June 2010 (UTC).

Actually, what you deleted did not say "solely." It said "he helped create and promote" Beacon in one version by an unsigned user. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.14.71.109 (talk) 05:57, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Edit War

There seems to be an edit war in this election. For this article, Kamala Harris and Rocky Delgadillo, these articles are extremely active, with warring edits. They are also in an election fight. Additional moderation is necessary.--LAbaseballFan (talk) 04:38, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Please note that the long text about Facebook Beacon is negative information about a living person and must not be restored without a top-quality verifiable citation. Stifle (talk) 13:28, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Is first-person Congressional Testimony not a reliable source? He has testified several times on Beacon as Facebook's Chief Privacy Officer. I linked to one such occasion (which you removed), and here's another from an official US Government website. His role while at Facebook was to oversee all privacy issues, as he has even stated himself. Beacon is a privacy issue that was handled completely during his tenure. Seems pretty relevant to keep the material in.--LAbaseballFan (talk) 13:47, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chris Kelly (entrepreneur). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100522094836/http://www.kelly2010.com:80/about to http://www.kelly2010.com/about
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150213214021/http://www.49ers-academy.org/our-story/board-of-directors.html to http://www.49ers-academy.org/our-story/board-of-directors.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:40, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chris Kelly (entrepreneur). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140725074048/http://www.newleaderscouncil.org/nlc_board_of_directors to http://www.newleaderscouncil.org/nlc_board_of_directors

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:28, 5 August 2017 (UTC)