Talk:Christian Copyright Licensing International

Fair use rationale for Image:CCLILogo.jpg

Image:CCLILogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:46, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:SongSelectLogo.gif

Image:SongSelectLogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:54, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Criticism section

According to CCLI.INFO, CCLI.COM licenses are not needed for any reason for worship services.

I have removed the ctiricism section; i shall append it here to save it, should anyone wish to rescue it. It was not, however, at all encyclopeadic, but consisted merely of someone's opinions and criticisms, original research, in fact. Here it is:
* How should someone call the one who charges the bride (the church) with money for speaking with the bridegroom (Christ)? An apt word would be 'Thief'. CCLI is against the Scriptures.
* In the mission statement of CCLI, the Holy Bible never teaches of any enhanced worship expression but rather to worship in truth and spirit. The Holy Bible neither teaches to worship spontaneously nor conveniently or affordably and legally. Worshiping legally is absolutely against the Holy Scriptures as God did not asked His people to worship Him only when allowed by the rulers of the land. Read Daniel 3:9-28
* Any gospel song is from the Holy Spirit and not of any individual. But copyright can be claimed only when the work is an original work of the author. Read Psalms 40:3
* Bible commands to spread the Gospel for free. It also adds, doing it with charge is abusing. If money is involved in any Gospel work it is strictly abusing as per the Scriptures. Read 1 Corinthians 9:18 Cheers, Lindsay^Hi 18:16, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Arguments

According to CCLI.INFO, CCLI.COM licenses are not needed for any reason for worship services.

ccli.info no longer states the above

Alternatives to CCLI.COM

According to CCLI.INFO, CCLI.COM licenses are not needed for any reason for worship services. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.31.64.24 (talk) 13:14, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Christian Copyright Licensing International. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070806154018/http://www.ccli.com:80/CopyrightAdmin/RoyaltyProcess.cfm to http://www.ccli.com/CopyrightAdmin/RoyaltyProcess.cfm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070806154018/http://www.ccli.com:80/CopyrightAdmin/RoyaltyProcess.cfm to http://www.ccli.com/CopyrightAdmin/RoyaltyProcess.cfm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cb-cda.gc.ca/info/act-e.html#32.2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:42, 23 November 2016 (UTC)