Talk:Christian Fellowship in Richmond
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright problem removed
editPrior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 21:50, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
NPOV issues in introduction?
editThe intro currently says the church started after young people "saw a move of the Holy Spirit in Richmond England," which "led to the birth of gathering of Christians to worship the Lord." This language is very vague, and would be inscrutable to the average secular reader. What is a "move of the Holy Spirit" and what does it look like? Does the "birth of gathering of Christians to worship" refer to the founding of the church, and if so, can't it simply be described as such?Sadiemonster (talk) 10:57, 13 December 2015 (UTC)