Talk:Christians in Science
This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
[Untitled]
editThis page seems to be entirely based on Christians for Science website pages which are giving me 404 not found messages. Verification is needed from reliable secondary sources, and current links to these primary sources would also be a good idea. Stylistically, citation links should be at the end of statements, after the punctuation, and not in the headers as at present. Carry on, dave souza, talk 12:33, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- Suggestion: Editors should take these comments with a grain of salt. Souza may be targeting religious articles and deliberately naging on them in some way (tags, comments, etc.) Souza has been associated with the User:Hrafn, who at least two editors have raised concerns of anti-religious editing. --Firefly322 (talk) 19:09, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- Firefly, you're not a mind reader and your accusations of "anti-religious editing" are ludicrous and inept. Right now, the links on the article lead to "Sorry, the page you're looking for cannot be found. Our website has recently had a major reorganisation, and we apologise for the problems this has caused. Please use the navigation above or the search box to find what you were looking for, alternatively email webmaster@cis.org.uk" So if you want to keep this article, why not find reliable secondary sources, and update the links to the organisation itself? . . dave souza, talk 20:33, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- I created this a fairly long time ago because some of it's members seemed notable and I thought religion/science things are notable. It is mentioned in a few news articles.[1][2]--T. Anthony (talk) 12:55, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
- Firefly, you're not a mind reader and your accusations of "anti-religious editing" are ludicrous and inept. Right now, the links on the article lead to "Sorry, the page you're looking for cannot be found. Our website has recently had a major reorganisation, and we apologise for the problems this has caused. Please use the navigation above or the search box to find what you were looking for, alternatively email webmaster@cis.org.uk" So if you want to keep this article, why not find reliable secondary sources, and update the links to the organisation itself? . . dave souza, talk 20:33, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Possible copyright problem
editThis article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 22:51, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Christians in Science. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070203014126/http://www.cis.org.uk:80/about/history.shtml to http://www.cis.org.uk/about/history.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:40, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Christians in Science. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070407102400/http://www.cis.org.uk/about/statement_of_faith.shtml to http://www.cis.org.uk/about/statement_of_faith.shtml
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070407094937/http://www.cis.org.uk/about/aims.shtml to http://www.cis.org.uk/about/aims.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:29, 6 August 2017 (UTC)