This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
This article does not seem to assert the importance of the subject. Moreover, it has only one source. Also, it does not meet WP:ONEEVENT as "member of the Riksdag" is the only identifying marker. NpAtWM (talk) 04:40, 9 July 2020 (UTC) Another thing: That one source is in Swedish so we are not using English sources. 182.70.102.106 (talk) 04:58, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
Another option is to merge this article into Riksdag. NpAtWM (talk) 05:42, 9 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Being a member of parliament in not an event, and the article not only has an indication of importance/significance, but the subject is clearly notable per WP:POLITICIAN. There is also no prohibition on non-English sources, and restoring a speedy deletion tag contested in good faith is disruptive, so please don't do it again. If you really think that this should be deleted then the procedure to follow is described at WP:AFD, where others will also tell you that the subject is clearly notable. Phil Bridger (talk) 06:28, 9 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
