Talk:Christoph Ruckhäberle

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Original Research template

edit

The language is not encyclopedic, and there are no citations/references for any of the comments and opinions made. It feels like it is the writers own interpretation of a known body of work, informed by other opinions. Unfortunately, unless it can be shown as coming from acknowledged published sources, it should not appear in the article. If it isn't original research, then it may be copyvio... I will drop a note on the authors talkpage. LessHeard vanU 19:12, 31 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

When commenting as above at User talk:Infoart I noted various comments and requests regarding possible copyright violations on a number of subjects. I can, however, see no blocks for this editor. LessHeard vanU 19:28, 31 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Merge

edit

Merge needed with Christoph Ruckhäberle. Tyrenius 13:55, 31 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Done. Gordonofcartoon 01:16, 29 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Christoph Ruckhäberle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:17, 6 August 2017 (UTC)Reply