Talk:Christopher C. Rogers
Latest comment: 2 years ago by HouseBlaster in topic Feedback from New Page Review process
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notability
editThis is a borderline case. [1] is good. [2] is an WP:INTERVIEW. [3] is potentially not WP:INDEPENDENT. Other sources cited lack WP:SIGCOV. I optimistically assume more sources could be found if this goes to WP:AFD. ~Kvng (talk) 15:40, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Feedback from New Page Review process
editI left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thank you for creating this article! Two minor notes: I have removed the two statements that cited IMDb, as IMDb is not a reliable source. Additionally, per the second bullet point in MOS:LINKSTYLE, section headers should not themselves be wikilinked, instead, a {{main article}} should be placed directly after the section header. Other than those two small things, the article looks great!.
HouseBlastertalk 19:07, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
- @HouseBlaster, thank you for improving the article. Are you suggesting that these sorts of issues need to be addressed by the original authors or as articles pass through NPP or AFC? ~Kvng (talk) 14:49, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Kvng: For IMDb, I would say that it is the responsibility of both the original author and the reviewer, given it is an unreliable source and this is a BLP. As for MOS:LINKSTYLE, it is a minor issue and not really the "responsibility" of anyone. I just happened to see it and decided to volunteer to WP:JUSTFIXIT. After I made those changes, I figured I would use the built-in feedback option to deliver a quick message to the author just to let them know what I had changed, as a no-fault FYI. HouseBlastertalk 22:34, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- @HouseBlaster, it is generally appreciated that when you assign responsibility to two people, a common outcome is that neither takes responsibility. ~Kvng (talk) 14:27, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Kvng: I would say it is akin to copyvios. It is the job of a reviewer to check for copyvios, and to fix them if they exist. However, just because a reviewer is responsible for checking does not mean the original author can completely ignore copyright concerns. I apply the same line of thinking to BLP issues. HouseBlastertalk 00:49, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- @HouseBlaster, it is generally appreciated that when you assign responsibility to two people, a common outcome is that neither takes responsibility. ~Kvng (talk) 14:27, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Kvng: For IMDb, I would say that it is the responsibility of both the original author and the reviewer, given it is an unreliable source and this is a BLP. As for MOS:LINKSTYLE, it is a minor issue and not really the "responsibility" of anyone. I just happened to see it and decided to volunteer to WP:JUSTFIXIT. After I made those changes, I figured I would use the built-in feedback option to deliver a quick message to the author just to let them know what I had changed, as a no-fault FYI. HouseBlastertalk 22:34, 29 June 2022 (UTC)