Talk:Christopher Lekapenos/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: KAVEBEAR (talk · contribs) 05:31, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

• Please expand the lead. Something along the line of his two brothers' article.
•  Done
• Is there sufficient information to create a separate article for co-empress Sophia?

  Possibly, I'll add it to my todo-list. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 22:14, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

• "In the event, Christopher died in August 931, much mourned by his father, who shed tears "like the Egyptians" " --- Can you explain what this means?
•  Done
• You should explain what happened to his family after his death. I know it is covered in Romanos I Lekapenos but for the convenience of reader please provide a few sentences toward the end there about the family's fall from power in 945.
•  Done

• @KAVEBEAR: I believe I have fixed all issues. -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 22:21, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

1. B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it verifiable with no original research?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:

   C. It contains no original research:

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: