Talk:Chrobry II Battalion

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Name

edit

Shouldn't it be Battalion Chrobry II? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 23:17, 10 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

B-class

edit

Confirmed for WP:POLAND. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 01:35, 20 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

I'm having trouble finding the reference for the fact that there were AL soldiers in the unit again. I remember reading about it but at this point, given that I can't find substantiation for the claim again it might be best to remove it until someone can locate the info.VolunteerMarek 02:10, 20 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

A question of balance

edit

The article is currently very unbalanced with the amount of space devoted to the Prosta St. events in the context of the undoubted early successes and sheer grit and determination displayed by the youngsters of Chrobry II, hopelessly under equipped and living on the verge of starvation for 63 days! I shall import text and citations and I anticipate cutting the arguably unnecessary detail of the Prosta section. Some of the current links are dead.--Po Kadzieli (talk) 02:36, 28 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chrobry II Battalion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:14, 6 August 2017 (UTC)Reply