Talk:Chrodbert I
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Harachte in topic Robert was married possibly to Glismoda of Bavaria, parentage unknown.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Chrodbert I be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Robert was married possibly to Glismoda of Bavaria, parentage unknown.
editThis puzzles me. Does the word 'possibly' refer to the possibility that there was no marriage? Is it implying that the marriage was invalid? Or is it trying to say she was a concubine? Or is it a query as to whether the marriage (or concubinage) was with some woman, whose name might have been Glismoda the Bavarian? The statement is unreferenced, and desperately needs to be footnoted.
--Vicedomino (talk) 02:22, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- My best guess is that, as it is the case with most information in this article, the sources cited are guesswork at best, hence 'possible'. Settipani's work isn't verifiable. The only really credible source (medieval lands, added by me) -which is based on rather terse source material- does not contain a literal reference to the bishop, who is only known from a later episcopal catalogue. Everything is based on a supposed relationship between a number of individuals all named 'Robert'. It seems several individuals were mixed up. Harachte (talk) 21:31, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Something is wrong
editHow could he would die after 695 as his grandson Chrodbert II died after 678??