Talk:Chrome (band)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by 74.138.96.46 in topic Meet You In The Subway


Can anyone correct that?

According to his own article, Edge is born in 1949. In this article it says that he was 19 years old when his first album came out, and Chrome was formed in 1975.

Can anyone with more knowledge about the band clarify that? 95.90.246.59 (talk) 14:59, 1 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

All of the other sources are clear it is 1949 and this matches his HS graduation date and college degree, which would be both be impossible with the later date. Greg Fasolino (talk) 15:11, 1 April 2016 (UTC)Reply


Untitled

edit

The image added to this article is a promotional photograph from around 1980. Replaceable images of the band are rare due to Damon Edge (band member) being deceased.--Electronic Music (talk) 08:20, 23 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

The disoography here says: "Damon Edge period - Produced by Damon Edge in Europe" and lists Records from 1984-1994. The article about Damon Edge - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damon_Edge - says that he returned to the US in 1988. This should be claryfied/put more precise by anyone with more knowlegde than me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.190.20.166 (talk) 19:19, 9 January 2017 (UTC) PS: The Chrome-article states the band had been founded in 1975, the Damon-Edge-article says: 1976 ... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.190.20.166 (talk) 19:43, 9 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Meet You In The Subway

edit

May I request that the following be inserted:

"In 1979, Chrome's appeared on the Ralph Records compilation Subterranean Modern. The three tracks included their signature song, "Meet You In The Subway," which cemented their international fan base."

I believe mention should be made of this, since it was the influencing factor that got them signed to Beggars Banquet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.138.96.46 (talk) 20:16, 31 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

The additional verification warning should be removed

edit

The additional verification warning in the History section of the article was put in place in October 2014 and is significantly outdated. This is because since 2014, there are many sources that have been provided to bolster the claims made in this section to the point where additional sources could be provided and are welcome but not as necessary as it was in 2014. I was thinking of removing it, does anyone disagree with me doing that?