Talk:Chromium in glucose metabolism
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Zefr in topic Moving content elsewhere?
 | The contents of the Chromium in glucose metabolism page were merged into Chromium#Supplementation on October 2024. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chromium in glucose metabolism redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Moving content elsewhere?
editThe content in the Side effects and toxicity may be of better placement in the Chromium article, Biological role section. But without the in vitro content. David notMD (talk) 10:19, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
- Deleted content and ref that were based solely on animal studies (mice, rats, fruit flies). Also deleted older (2006 & 2007) reviews and replaced with newer meta-analyses. Deleted safety section, as the examples were case studies. Some content copied into this article from Chromium article, but not attributed in the Edit summary, as I had written the content that was copied from Chromium. David notMD (talk) 11:01, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
- Suggest a WP:MERGETEXT with Chromium, Biological role indicated by David notMD 6 years ago. Agree, Smokefoot? I'll take the job. Zefr (talk) 02:20, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- I agree that this merger should be done. Two more recent meta-analyses (PMID 33783683 (2022) and PMID 32730903 (2020)) should be considered as refs. And delete the older meta-analyses refs. David notMD (talk) 03:32, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Agree with merge. Wish we could say something about the amount money being made on Cr supplements. --Smokefoot (talk) 13:33, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- I agree that this merger should be done. Two more recent meta-analyses (PMID 33783683 (2022) and PMID 32730903 (2020)) should be considered as refs. And delete the older meta-analyses refs. David notMD (talk) 03:32, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Suggest a WP:MERGETEXT with Chromium, Biological role indicated by David notMD 6 years ago. Agree, Smokefoot? I'll take the job. Zefr (talk) 02:20, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
There wasn't much to actually merge, as the Chromium#Biological role section already discussed it adequately. I did create this small section on history, but felt the rest of the article, particularly the primary research and speculative mechanisms section, was deletable. Zefr (talk) 21:12, 19 October 2024 (UTC)