Talk:Chrono Resurrection/GA1

GA Review

• Woah, the first sentence is a mouthfull... can you split it up? Y
• "The team included up to nine members, most of which having about two-and-a-half years of experiences in the industry." --> "...most of which had about..."? Y
• Don't need to list the scenes that would be featured... borders on game guide content. Y
• "Due to time constraints, the development team expected that Robo and Ayla would have 50% chances of not being featured." - what makes these characters special or worthy of extra note compared to the other characters that could be featured? Y
• "The team tried to capture the feel of the original game with updated graphics and sounds.[6] The artists and animators faced difficulty in reproducing the characters due to the differences of style between the original game's sprites, artwork and PlayStation version anime sequences" - stops talking about characters, then mentions them again in the next sentence. Flow could be improved. Y
• "letter to Resurrection Games before it" --> "...before that date"? Y

There aren't many issues; it's generally a good and interesting read. Please leave me a note when you're done with this. Cheers, —Giggy 15:00, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

I believe I have fixed all of the issues. However, if the original nominator had something different in mind when I removed some content, apologies and feel free to add it back. I am in no way an expert on this topic. That being said I think the article looks GA quality now. Artichoker^[talk] 15:42, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

I think you did well, thanks. I added back the info about Robo and Ayla, because the original game had only seven playable characters and so I think it's worth mentioning that they were all to appear in the demo except two. I did reword the sentence though since it wasn't clear how many characters there were. Kariteh (talk) 17:42, 6 July 2008 (UTC)