Talk:Chronology protection conjecture
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
physics, comics
editThere should be linking between this physics article and the comic book article on the Time Variance Authority, which is essentionally the same concept, first appearing in 1986. Kevingarcia 06:41, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
- I appreciate the links to pop culture, but I couldn't help but think of a parallel with some of the more unusual hypotheses of John C. Lilly.73.154.61.4 (talk) 23:11, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chronology protection conjecture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101125122824/http://hawking.org.uk/index.php/lectures/63 to http://www.hawking.org.uk/index.php/lectures/63
https://www.amazon.com/Treatise-Proposed-Chronology-Protection-Mechanics/dp/108791454X
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:27, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
Proposed Chronology Protection Law
editRobert Tseglin proposed a Chronology Protection Law derived from the results of the double slit experiment, in a book published on September 21st 2020 titled " Treatise on the Proposed Chronology Protection Law Derived from Quantum Mechanics." Rtseglin (talk) 06:25, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi, welcome to Wikipedia. I undid your edit because the book you mention appears to be self-published and is difficult to verify as a reliable source. For the latter reason, self-published sources are usually not suitable for Wikipedia. MaxwellMolecule (talk) 07:05, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
The Publication of Robert Tseglin of a Treatise on the Proposed Chronology Protection Law Derived from Quantum Mechanics
editThe implications address not only time-like curves and analysis of the barriers to backwards time travel, and other connections in physics, particularly between various quantum phenomena, and between quantum mechanics and relativity, but through such analyses even proposes similarities and connections that could be explored mathematically to endeavor to arrive at a unified theory. 2A02:6680:113A:E882:C5:2A4B:FF43:86D5 (talk) 20:17, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
show me to show my headset
editbefore I destroyed my headset 2600:1014:A007:AA43:2190:9038:6066:24DF (talk) 04:39, 8 April 2024 (UTC)