Talk:Chrysler Europe

File:Simca 1307 GLS 1978.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Simca 1307 GLS 1978.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 25 February 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Simca 1307 GLS 1978.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:19, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Chrysler Europe Division

I cannot find any support for the claim that Chrysler Europe was a division that was formed by 3 companies. Sales literature that I have browsed and the internet do not mention such name from the 1960s and 1970s. Põdravorst (talk) 16:24, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

And calling it a subsidiary would imply that it was some sort of a business entity? If so than such business called Chrysler Europe, that was parent of Rootes, Simca and Barreriros, did not exist in that time period. Põdravorst (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:46, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Can you explain why this matters? --Dennis Bratland (talk) 21:42, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Because maybe it is misleading or even wrong? The subsidiary part to me at least sounds wrong. Was there a thing called Chrysler Europe Ltd or something like that? If there is no mention of it being a business entity like that then why should this page make such claim? Or am I not understanding what is a subsidiary? Põdravorst (talk) 05:08, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Many sources call it "Chrysler Europe". They don't mention whether it is a subsidiary or division or purple unicorn. We should call it Chrysler Europe because that's what our sources call it. Since our sources don't seem to think it matters whether it was a subsidiary or division or whatever, let's just delete mention of that. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 05:25, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

I do not have a problem it being called a Chrysler Europe. I think an issue is that what was a Chrysler Europe. What should or does it refer to? Põdravorst (talk) 05:32, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

It refers to Chrysler's European operations, the companies Chrysler controlled through a majority interest, from 1967 trough 1978. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 05:42, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

I belive that this is correct. Põdravorst (talk) 05:50, 30 March 2018 (UTC)