Talk:Chuck Versus the Cliffhanger/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Matthew RD 19:22, 30 June 2011 (UTC) Hello, I will be reviewing this article. I shall do so soon. -- Matthew RD 19:22, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

OK now I will review the page. At first glance it looks good enough, lets look indepth and review it against the GA critera.

1. Well written: See notes below
2. Factually accurate and verifiable: Mostly pass, see notes below
3. Broad in coverage: Stays within topic. Passed
4. Neutral: Passed
5. Stable: Passed
6. Images: Two free images, they're fine (though Fedak's is blurry, but that's no issue)

Overall the article is well done, with just the odd issues.

• The article is almost well written. The one problem I do have though is to fully pronounce initials (CIA to Central Intelligence Agency, then feel free to abbreviate it afterwards, like Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and/or keep it abbreviated in following mentions, and ER to emergency room)
  •  Done
• I think the songs of the episode are more suited in the inbobox under "Music = " field, but it's alright if you feel otherwise. Other Chuck episode articles have music in the prose. It's up to you.
  • For consistency, I think I'll leave it the way it is for now. I may change that on this and other episodes in the future, but I've only seen that parameter used for music performed in episodes of a series (like Glee).
• You could cite ratings from the previous week and mention how much it's gone up like you did in Chuck Versus the Last Details. Again that's up to you.
  •  Done
• Ref #2 says it was published in April 22, 2011, yet the web page itself says April 22, 2010.
  •  Fixed. Seems I mixed up the date and accessdate.
• Ref #6 needs a publisher.
  •  Fixed. Tell me if there's anything else. :) --Boycool (talk) 14:23, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

I will place the article on hold for seven days, though I doubt this will take long. Good luck. -- Matthew RD 20:57, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for addressing the issues. I will pass the article. Well done, and I hope to see more Chuck episode articles like this. -- Matthew RD 23:52, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you, sir! --Boycool (talk) 00:44, 4 July 2011 (UTC)