Talk:Chucrallah Fattouh

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because the biographical information is available in all the references that i mentioned and shared with you. The majority of the information available on the net comes from the official catalogue of the artist and i'm the one who wrote it. I can send you a copy of the catalogue and it's signed by me. Regards

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chucrallah Fattouh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131017032147/http://www.destinationjeddah.com/portal/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=807%3Achucrallah-fattouh-transcending-culture-through-art&catid=106%3Aarticles-a-reviews&Itemid=492 to http://www.destinationjeddah.com/portal/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=807%3Achucrallah-fattouh-transcending-culture-through-art&catid=106%3Aarticles-a-reviews&Itemid=492
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130725054942/http://binkadiso.ci/artcompare.htm to http://binkadiso.ci/artcompare.htm
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://old.naharnet.com/domino/tn/Guides.nsf/GalByNam/7EE05285BAD0EF28C2256970003784FE?OpenDocument

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:58, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

External links

There are eleven entries in the "External links". Three seems to be an acceptable number and of course, everyone has their favorite to add for four. The problem is that none is needed for article promotion.

• ELpoints #3) states: Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum. A lack of external links or a small number of external links is not a reason to add external links.
• LINKFARM states: There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to the external links section of an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Wikipedia. On articles about topics with many fansites, for example, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate.
• WP:ELMIN: Minimize the number of links.
• WP:ELCITE: ...access dates are not appropriate in the external links section. Do not use {{cite web}} or other citation templates in the External links section. Citation templates are permitted in the Further reading section.
• WP:ELBURDEN: Disputed links should be excluded by default unless and until there is a consensus to include them. -- Otr500 (talk) 06:27, 9 March 2023 (UTC)