Talk:Chung Ling High School
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chung Ling High School article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Chung Ling High School Choir was copied or moved into Chung Ling High School with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
I suggest that the news about dragon boat tradegy should be created in Wikinews.
Feedback
editThe following is reproduced from Wikipedia:Requests for feedback (currently archived), posted here for your reference:
I write this:
- "This is my another major edit, which the difference is here. This article concerns a school in Penang, Malaysia offering secondary and pre-university education. Again, thanks in advance!
- Eng Aun 19:16, 28 January 2007 (UTC)"
And this is the feedback from RJHall:
- "It looks like good work. Here's a few things I noticed:
- The introduction is far too short (suggest looking at Wikipedia:Lead section)
- The table of contents seems too long. Perhaps the sub-section headings in the "The campus" section can be replaced by bolded text?
- Automated PR reviews flags sub-sections that begin with "an" or "the". So "The identity" could be "Identity", for example.
- Your history section is in need of citations.
- I'm not sure about the use of so much non-English language in the text; most non-native speakers won't know what that means anyway.
- Thanks. — RJH (talk) 17:26, 13 February 2007 (UTC)"
Any further comments?
Eng Aun 19:08, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
So apparently someone just wrote that CLHS is the 1st in Malaysia by saying we beat Jit Sin and CLHS Butterworth. I doubt where can we find an official ranking and the person wrote this only know about schools in Penang (without even comparing schools from other states). I tried to ask for sources but my edit was marked as vandalism. Is this what we are striving for, CLHS? Chung Ling-boleh style?
And I believe the college project has been abandoned but the paragraphs about the college still gives other an impression that the school is carrying out the idea of having a college. If nothing has been done, at least the current status should be upadted. --User:VWGolf —Preceding undated comment added 04:52, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Deletion
editWHERE THE HECK IS THE ARTICLE?? SOMEONE DELETED IT???
Yes, someone did delete it. We are currently requesting for information. Stkhoo 16:21, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
I've reverted the page and added more information, including citation of sources. Hopefully more citations will be added into the article. Eng Aun 10:54, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
I have translated a few articles that I thought could be of use here, and I just post the fully-edited page for your consideration. Please do not post it on the main article for the time being. Thanks! Eng Aun 17:01, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Update: The section has been uploaded to the main article! Eng Aun 11:19, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Copyvio notice
editI've tagged the article for copyvio as some section was copied. If you would like to visit the article or edit it, see Talk:Chung Ling High School/Temp. Regards, NgYShung huh? 09:31, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Chung Ling High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051108023525/http://www.mosti.gov.my/opencms/opencms/MostePortal/GEN/dstn2bi.pdf to http://www.mosti.gov.my/opencms/opencms/MostePortal/GEN/dstn2bi.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120617065741/http://www.ukm.my/ipho/participate.htm to http://www.ukm.my/ipho/participate.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722103148/http://www.kwongwah.com.my/news/2007/10/26/83.html to http://www.kwongwah.com.my/news/2007/10/26/83.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060804104246/http://chungling9092.com/ to http://www.chungling9092.com/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071009161006/http://www.friendmily.com/group/clhs96 to http://www.friendmily.com/group/clhs96
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:09, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
Merge of Chung Ling High School Choir
edit- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was merge. No need for this to be open any longer. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 18:47, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
There is no indication that the choir is independently notable and lacks citations to independent sources. As an alternative to deletion, it can be mentioned here in the school article. MB 21:40, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Concur with MB - I was going to PROD it, but the merger makes more sense. Nosebagbear (talk) 13:09, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- Don't merge
Concur with MB- The choir is recently developed in a very fast and positive manner, therefore I suggested it to be retain as a standalone article. Santhulanistan (talk) 13:09, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- I think you mean that you do not concur so I shall refactor you comment especially as you are the article creator. --Dom from Paris (talk) 14:49, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
- Merge I agree with MB and Nosebagbear on this point. --Dom from Paris (talk) 14:50, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
- Merge will not pass WP:GNG, merge with the school article rather than be nominated for deletion.Wakowako (talk) 09:24, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
- Merge - definitely. No indication of independent notability. I probably would have simply redirected the article, with a not to the article's creator to add any info to the HS article.Onel5969 TT me 11:24, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
Please have a read, "Schoolcruft is a phenomenon which appears on Wikipedia when editors who are passionate and enthusiastic about a particular school, generally one they are either a current or recent student of, feel the impulse over a protracted period of time to share their passion with us, their audience, by creating a mini-shrine to their institution of learning and, in fact, almost anything relating to said institution, on Wikipedia."
We don't put school songs and anthems in school articles, this has been consistently applied across WP.LibStar (talk) 07:15, 9 May 2023 (UTC)