This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
@Anthony Appleyard: I'm really starting to see a discrepancy in the way you treat redirects made by other users versus how you treat mine. You have, in the past, completely overwritten redirects of mine even if I've made subsequent edits adding Template:R from album and categories like Futuresay22 did here. Instead, when another user, in this case Futuresay22, has created a redirect, you feel the need to histmerge their three unimportant edits before the redirect I made for Church (Galantis album) was created, which is the location where content was started by another user. In any other case, you yourself would call these parallel histories that don't need to be merged. If I didn't know any better, I would say it's really starting to seem like you have something against either me as an editor or the redirects I create, or you think I'm a problematic editor for the amount of redirects I make or whatever else other users I've argued with on your talk page have accused me of, because you overwrite or delete mine without a second thought but go out of your way to retain the redirects other users create. Please start treating the redirects I make the same as you do for other users. If a user chooses, of their own accord, to create content on a redirect that another user (in this case me) has made, you should not be deciding to delete my redirect (as you also did with SuperM (EP)) or find some way to merge another user's redirect before mine (as you've done here). Thank you. Ss11205:25, 7 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Anthony Appleyard: There is nothing in that request that asks for a histmerge; you did it of your own accord. Futuresay22's redirect with three insignificant edits could have been moved out of the way. I don't see that there was any reason to histmerge Church (Galantis album) with what was at Church (album). As I said, in the past, you have completely erased redirects I have made even where I've added categories in subsequent edits, but when it comes to others' redirects you'll preserve them? You need to treat them all the same, because this is starting to look like something against me specifically. Please stop ignoring this when I bring it up with you. Ss11207:06, 7 February 2020 (UTC)Reply