Talk:Church of St Peter, Williton

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified


Infobox

edit

Yes, it's an historic site. But as a functioning parish church, shouldn't it have a church infobox? Martinevans123 (talk) 08:34, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

As far as I'm concerned you are welcome to change it, however if the article is generally about the religion (high v low church etc), current vicar priest etc I would use the church one - if it is primarily about history and architecture I tend to use the historic site one.— Rod talk 16:11, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
I have no strong view... except where to put the vicar!? Perhaps User:Peter I. Vardy could advise us here. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:45, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
By habit, I use the church infobox for churches. It allows for plenty of info about the history and architecture, as well as having the extra fields for personnel, etc. But I guess it's up to the editor's preference. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 17:53, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Fear not, I shan't be rushing in with flowerguild, businessmgr or episcopalarea... Martinevans123 (talk) 18:09, 7 March 2014 (UTC) Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Church of St Peter, Williton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:25, 7 August 2017 (UTC)Reply