Talk:Churwalden

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Churwalden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:56, 24 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Churwalden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100628110559/http://www.bevoelkerungsschutz.admin.ch/internet/bs/de/home/themen/kgs/kgs_inventar/a-objekte.html to http://www.babs.admin.ch/de/aufgabenbabs/kgs/inventar/a-objekte.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:55, 7 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Needs translation fixed

Latest comment: 9 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

The article says, "Churwalden is a semitourist community." In English, we don't have a word "semitourist", so I can only guess at the intended meaning. I am guessing that it was a sentence translated from a artile written in German. Perhaps someone else can discover the correct translation. Mark (talk) 23:01, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

It belongs to Swiss structural typology of municipalities (which distinguishes between "touristische" and "semitouristische Gemeinden" in German, or "communes touristiques" and "communes semi-touristiques" in French). In some English language publications (on this particular Swiss administrative socio-economic typology) I found "semi-touristic", so the sentence could be changed to "Churwalden is a semi-touristic community", but without further explanation that sentence isn't very informative to most readers either. ---Sluzzelin talk 23:17, 26 February 2024 (UTC) ... (added later) I changed the sentence for the sake of correct English, but still remain unconvinced that it (the sentence) alone is worth keeping (it might be worth expanding though). ---Sluzzelin talk 23:30, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for confirming that this is indeed a translation problem. Is there some place you know of where I can read what is meant by the "touristische" and "semitouristische Gemeinden" designations"?

I found a paper by the Swiss Federal Statistical Office from 2005 (Die Raumgliederungen der Schweiz by Martin Schuler, Pierre Dessemontet and Dominique Joye, can't link to the pdf-file) which defines semi-touristic municipalities as follows (my unauthorized translation, I didn't find it in English):

"Municipalities that don't belong to any metropolitan agglomeration and meet one of the following conditions:

resident population < 100, and tourism (measured in annual overnight stays) > 150 per inhabitant
100 < resident population < 200, and tourism > 100 per inhabitant
200 < resident population < 300, and tourism > 80 per inhabitant
300 < resident population < 500, and tourism > 60 per inhabitant
500 < resident population < 2000, and tourism > 45 per inhabitant
resident population > 2000, and tourism > 30 per inhabitant"

So Churwalden, with a resident population of over 2000, fits the last one. In order for it to be touristic rather than semi-touristic, the number of annual overnight stays in Churwalden would have to exceed 45 per inhabitant (not just 30 per inhabitant). I'm still not sure it makes sense to use the term "semi-touristic" in the article. Tourism is obviously important for Churwalden, and the distinction between "touristic" and "semi-touristic" is an arbitrary one that serves the Federal Statistical Office's purpose, and I don't think it will be commonly understood by most readers of en.wikipedia. ---Sluzzelin talk 14:37, 27 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic