Talk:Cincinnati, New Orleans and Texas Pacific Railway

Untitled

edit

Why rathole?

Tabletop 02:54, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

It is called that by the numerous tunnels and deep cuts that runs from Emory Gap, TN, to Danville, KY. TVSRR 00:21, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Why a redirect?

edit

Why is the information in this article getting moved into the Norfolk Southern article? slambo 01:26, July 14, 2005 (UTC)

Further discussion should be placed on the Norfolk Southern talk page to keep all the comments in one place. slambo 11:00, July 15, 2005 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Why Not Redirect to Cincinnati Southern?

edit

Since Cincinnati, New Orleans and Texas Pacific is only a sub leaser of the Cincinnati Southern Railway to Norfolk Southern why is this fact not just a foot note in the Cincinnati Southern entry? CNOTP does not own the right of way, they did not build it and have not operated it in living memory. I suspect the answer is that the name CNOTP has stuck only because that is who Norfolk Southern sub-leases it from.

One of the great omissions in this article is the lines which CNOTP did operate other than the CS while it was a real operating railroad before it leases it's lines to Southern. There is little to let one know that CNOTP operated other lines and was once a 'real' railroad. I would expect to find it's date of creation and the date it ceased operating and became nothing but a leasing company.Corumplex (talk) 03:47, 6 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

This sounds like a proposal to split this article into two: Cincinnati, New Orleans and Texas Pacific Railway to discuss all the railway's historical operating lines, and Cincinnati Southern Railway to discuss the present railway. – Minh Nguyễn 💬 05:40, 25 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.