Talk:Cincinnati Bearcats football

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Sir Edward V in topic Rivalries

Travis Kelce? Why was he removed???

edit

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.gobearcats.com/sports/m-footbl/archive/coaching.html http://www.gobearcats.com/sports/m-footbl/archive/coaching.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:58, 10 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Same goes for [1], though this was copied from http://www.collegefootballhistory.com/bearcats/history.htm. --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 01:37, 18 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
Since material was dredged from history, I have deleted it, but fully attributed the creative content in edit summary. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:56, 6 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Image deletion discussion

edit

Relevant deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2011_December_30#File:Cincinnatibearcats.png.--GrapedApe (talk) 17:21, 2 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in Cincinnati Bearcats football

edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Cincinnati Bearcats football's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "grfx.cstv.com":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 08:24, 20 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cincinnati Bearcats football. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:14, 10 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cincinnati Bearcats football. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:39, 7 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Football season articles

edit

If anyone is interested joining this Season article campaign, Cincinnati is still on the list as needing articles created. Mjs32193 (talk) 02:04, 15 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Rivalries

edit

I just noticed new "rivalries" have been added. Cincinnati-Memphis and Cincinnati-Xavier. I'm not sure at what point a matchup becomes a rivalry. It seems there is some basis for the one with Xavier as I noticed a linked article documenting it. I did not check yet on Memphis, but I've been following Bearcats football for about 15 years and I would never have called Memphis a rival. Maybe someone who has been following the team for longer has some historical context i am missing. I'm curious what the basis was for including them. Is there a guideline on this somewhere. Nathan (talk) 03:03, 17 January 2020 (UTC)Reply