Talk:Cinema of Indonesia/Archives/2012

Removal of red-links

All names added which do not have connected articles shouldbe removed according to the following criteria for English Wikipedia - at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:LISTS

there is a difference between what has happened here and what should happen at a legitimate list. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NOT#DIR

As a consequence - there is a need for all editors trying to add material here understand

1. Naming an item here means (a) 'an article exists with WP:RS, WP:N and WP:V guidelines as expected in English wikipedia

1. No article linked to = no mention here

1. No WP:RS, or items to help WP:V or WP:N in an article - no mention hre

Thank you SatuSuro 04:13, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Chinese Parasitism?

Where is the debate about the mass of Pribumi art film versus Indian and Chinese mass consumption rubbish? What of the pribumi art films that make Indonesian cinema- cinema and not just cheap typical plagiarized Glodok crap? The Tan and Hong family mafias?

What of such notable films as "Opera Jawa", "Daun di atas bantal" and "Cut nyah Dien"? Is it a case of Wikipedia's PC trendy smug middle-class Suharto-phobia that the films of 17 Agustus and G30S are ignored?

Very unimpressive and arbitrary selective use of NPOV. You seem to enjoy censuring controversial fact to appease an arbitrary dogma of bland non-offense wherever possible tending to gloss over the many documented acts of treachery of the uninvited hostile alien 3%. The patriotic duty of all Indonesian is to document the economic parasitism and treachery of the hostile 3% no matter how politically unfashionable it may currently be in the West- which itself also an excellent example of Western moral imperialism and chauvinism. To weasel word or gloss is intellectually dishonest and I seriously question your allegiance to Solider Pribumi and Indonesia's majority for peer recognition and acceptance.Starstylers (talk) 02:55, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Only just read March 2008 - what a lot of rubbish (sic) - if you are going to leave messages like this expect to find yourself on the real far outside outer -

If you have WPRS for any of your conspiracy ideas - all you have to do is edit accordingly.

However to leave a message like this and no further editing regarding the subject suggests a severe case of the I really dont want to edit here, but here have a spray before I get blocked again SatuSuro 04:32, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

I didn't notice Starstyler's comment either til now. I don't want to see Starstylers blocked again (which would presumably be permanent if there was a next time) as amongst the appalling mode of his expression, there is more than one nugget of truth amongst the nuggets of rubbish. I would like to seem him constructively edit as I know he can. On a more specific point, i note he calls upon the "patriotic duty of all Indonesian" to presumably edit wikipedia. While I would love to see more Indonesians constructively edit wikipedia, Starstyler should note that patriotism for any country, ethnicity, etc should never be a justification to edit wikipedia and will more than likely be detrimental to the encyclopedia. The only justification to edit is to improve the encyclopedia in a manner that is dispassionate, rational and verifiable. If you believe you have a valid point to make, then please improve you communication which has been appallingly hostile and does not foster collaboration. --Merbabu (talk) 06:35, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Could not have put it better myself SatuSuro 09:33, 16 March 2009 (UTC)