Talk:Cinema therapy

Copy vio note

The article is not a copyright violation. The only piece from the medical dictionary is the definition, which is in a blockquote. The rest of the article is properly cited - and was absolutely not taken from the dictionary.

Thanks for the watchful eye, though, for copyright vio issues. I cannot tell you how many articles that I've cleaned up that were copyright violations.--CaroleHenson (talk) 12:48, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Removing copyright violation notice

I am removing the copyright violation notice and responding to the things that must be done before it's deleted

1. If MadmanBot is in error: Simply note so on this article's discussion page. Done
2. Replace the copyrighted text with your own work. Note that simply modified or rephrased text is still an infringement—to remove the copyrighted contents you will need to completely remove them and then write totally new text to replace it. Not needed, the block of text from the noted site was in a block quote. I did, though, add the source of the information to help clarify that the following is a quote. See Wikipedia:MOSQUOTE#Quotations and Blockquote element
3. If you hold the copyright to this text and permit its use under the terms consistent with Wikipedia's policies, please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions on how to verify the licensing. Not applicable
4. Replace the copyrighted contents with a wikified reference. See #2
5. Check whether it is reasonable to revert to one of the previous versions of the article See #2
6. Or, just remove the copyrighted contents if it is not critical to the article. See #2

Thanks, though, for the vigilant checking of article content for copyright violations! It's much better to wrongly tag than to miss articles that need to be tagged.--CaroleHenson (talk) 13:02, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Contributor's authorship of related book

A contributor to this article is the author of a book on the topic. I have just extensively edited film/video-based therapy, which explains the differences between itself and cinema therapy. The former focuses on film creation as a method of therapy; the latter is about therapy through watching already-existing film.

Because of that difference, I have removed most of a subsection from this article, which was largely off-topic; it focused on film/video-based therapy instead of cinema therapy (the text also appears verbatim at film/video-based therapy). I left the parts which seemed relevant, left the section heading itself, and transferred explanatory text from "clinical outcomes" to that section. I also left the author's reference to his own book, as it is legitimately on-topic. Lest someone feel like this is a vendetta, my goal is not to remove reference to this book altogether, but to keep the articles relevant and appropriate for Wikipedia. Jessicapierce (talk) 17:09, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cinema therapy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150924113853/http://www.taylorandfrancis.com/articles/discover_the_companion_website_for_video_and_filmmaking_as_psychotherapy/ to http://www.taylorandfrancis.com/articles/discover_the_companion_website_for_video_and_filmmaking_as_psychotherapy/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:05, 8 August 2017 (UTC)