Talk:Cinepoly Records

Hong Kong Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (22)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (60) • B-Class articles (289)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,039)

Image needed (348)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,447) • Stub-Class articles (6,731)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (389) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,340)

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Record Labels Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Labels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of record labels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Record LabelsWikipedia:WikiProject Record LabelsTemplate:WikiProject Record Labelsrecord labels articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

Latest comment: 11 years ago7 comments3 people in discussion

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 23:18, 8 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Cinepoly Records → Cinepoly – Some sources omit "Records". Relisted. BDD (talk) 23:56, 27 September 2013 (UTC) George Ho (talk) 07:01, 20 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Oppose. "Records" is in company logo, and per WP:MOS RECORD LABEL. 78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 13:33, 20 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
- It's not a guideline yet. Also, it says use "Records" instead of a parenthetical disambiguation. But it doesn't forbid omission of "Records". Look at EMI. --George Ho (talk) 14:41, 20 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nope, but Records is best practices, in my opinion. Now, if *all* sources omit "Records", then that is a compelling argument, but because only some do, I think "Records" should be part of the article title. 78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 14:48, 20 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Oh, wait: there is EMI Records, different from EMI (a company). --George Ho (talk) 14:52, 20 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, but on your side there is Motown. This is generally the exception, not the rule, however. 78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 15:03, 20 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic