Talk:Ciprian Marica

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Juventus Turin

edit

I removed the bit about Juventus is tracking Marica because I cannot see why this could be relevant. Lots of players are tracked by lots of clubs. What is so important in this case that it has to be mentioned in the lede (as the third sentence of the article, no less)? The only reason I can see for adding this is to speculate about an upcoming transfer (which is against WP:CRYSTAL). The publication date of the article is 18 November 2010, the winter transfer window is closed now and Juventus has not signed him. This decreases the relevance even further. --Jaellee (talk) 18:34, 2 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ciprian Marica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:58, 8 August 2017 (UTC)Reply