Talk:Circle on Cavill

	Australia portal Circle on Cavill is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Architecture

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

"Official" website

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

There appears to be some dispute as to which external link(s) to include on this page. There appears to be no "official" website for this development, only websites advertising the development or leases therein (see these links which have been added at some point or another: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]). My opinion is that none of these links should be included, unless someone else can make a case for one or more of them to be included, keeping in mind that Wikipedia should avoid anything that could be construed as advertising. -RunningOnBrains^(talk) 10:28, 1 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

As my reversions would suggest, links 3, 4 and 5 above seem to me the most official. However, I agree that until there is an actual official website for the development that we can verify, there should be no external links in the article. --timsdad ^(talk) 10:40, 1 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Circle on Cavill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140821040218/http://circleoncavill.com.au/?page_id=2400 to http://circleoncavill.com.au/?page_id=2400

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:31, 8 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic