Talk:Circular Congregational Church and Parish House
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Photos
editPhotos and/or photo uploads are needed.
- HABS or HAER photos may be available for this site. Search HABS/HAER here
- Some of NRHP photos linked in article are taken by NPS employee, hence public domain and can be used.
- NRHP photos seem not to be available on-line for this site.
- New photos would be helpful.
TEMPORARY EDITOR NOTE: The South Carolina scanned copy of NRHP nomination seemingly available by Microsoft Internet Explorer browsing only, at South Carolina Department of Archives and History search site HERE, may be SAME OR DIFFERENT as the NRHP docs linked in article, and available at the National Park Service. If same, delete this note. If different, adapt this footnote.[1]
Name of site
editThe NHL program name of the site is "Parish House of the Circular Congregational Church", as shown in the NHL webpage [1] and in the NHL program PDF list of NHLs nation-wide. However, this seems to be an error as the NRHP name and the title of the 1973 document about the site is "Circular Congregational Church and Parish House". The NHL webpage seems to describe the church, not the associated parish house. doncram (talk) 06:24, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed
editPrior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.circularchurch.org/content.cfm?id=2002. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Mangoe (talk) 12:26, 26 September 2011 (UTC)