Talk:Circus Oz
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Founding date
editThe article says:
Circus Oz was founded in December 1978 in Melbourne with its first performance season in March 1978.
It seems dubious that its first performance was after it was founded. Should this be March 1979? —sroc 💬 13:40, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Circus Oz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120311063925/http://www.circusoz.com/digitalAssets/1479_1234416397068_The%20History%20of%20Circus%20Oz.pdf to http://www.circusoz.com/digitalAssets/1479_1234416397068_The%20History%20of%20Circus%20Oz.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060823095203/http://cultureandrecreation.gov.au/articles/circus/ to http://www.cultureandrecreation.gov.au/articles/circus/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:28, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Needs update by independent editors
editI don't know what's been going on here, but I note that there have been a couple of single-purpose obviously COI editors adding a huge amount of unnecessary detail about the internal goings-on of the company, with poor citing and formatting, etc. I don't have time to sort it all out myself now, so have reverted to an earlier copy before it all started. A Wikipedia article doesn't need to contain lengthy lists of every destination on every tour, either. A (brief) paraphrase of whatever the review covered, the outcome of the review leading to the attempted closure, and the current situation is all it really needs here. If one of the involved editors wishes to post a few paragraphs with suggested wording, with citations, that would save some time for an uninvolved editor to add it to the article. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:13, 10 October 2022 (UTC)