Talk:Cisnormativity/GA1
Latest comment: 10 months ago by FenrisAureus in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: FenrisAureus (talk · contribs) 11:14, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Last updated: 02:07, 22 December 2023 (UTC) by FenrisAureus
See what the criteria are and what they are not
1) Well-written
- 1a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct
- 1b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation
2) Verifiable with no original research
- 2a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
- 2b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)
- 2c) it contains no original research
- Sources spot checked for reliability and NOR:
Ref # pass/fail 4 ✓ Pass 15 ✓ Pass 16 ✓ Pass 23 ✓ Pass 28 ✓ Pass
- 2d) it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism
- Earwig score 2% similarity. [1] Plagarism highly unlikely. — FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they) (talk) 02:07, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
3) Broad in its coverage
- 3a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic
- 3b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)
4) Neutral:
- 4) Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each
5) Stable:
- 5) Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute
6) Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio
- 6a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content
- 6b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions
Overall: Looks good to me. Pass.— FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they) (talk) 07:41, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Comments: