Talk:Citadelle Laferrière
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editIf someone is willing to compartmentalize and format this, I can add more informational content.
i removed the term slaves from the article since slavery was abolished at the time the Citadelle was being built.
Fair use rationale for Image:Citadelle large.jpg
editImage:Citadelle large.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Earthquake Damage?
editDoes anybody know how this world heritage site fared in the earthquake? I didn't see anything about it on the main page.Tericee (talk) 18:14, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
- It's located in/near Cap-Haïtien, which is outside of the zone where major damage occurred. -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 18:04, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Largest Fortress in the Americas
editCan I just make a comment about the first paragraph, and specifically this statement "It is the largest fortress in the Americas". Can you quantify this claim, largest in what way? If "Americas" is taken to mean both North, Central and South American landmasses, (as defined by Wikipedia) I can think of half a dozen off the top of my head that are larger in some way to Citadelle Laferriere.
In the same region:
Castillo de San Felipe de Morro, Puerto Rico. Fortaleza de San Carlos de la Cabana, Havana Cuba. San Juan de Ulua, Veracrus, Mexico.
North America:
Fort George, Halifax, Canada. The Citadel, Quebec, Canada. Fort Monroe, Virginia, USA.
All the above appear to be larger than the Citadelle Laferriere in some way. So can you say in what way it is the largest fortress in the Americas, as this is quite a sweeping statement. I did wonder if you meant the highest? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrew381968 (talk • contribs) 18:03, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Citadelle Laferrière. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120815104054/http://globalheritagefund.org/onthewire/blog/state_of_citadel to http://globalheritagefund.org/onthewire/blog/state_of_citadel
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140427221430/http://www.ghn.globalheritagefund.org/explore.php?id=1036 to http://www.ghn.globalheritagefund.org/explore.php?id=1036
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://globalheritagefund.org/video/haiti_citadel
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:03, 8 August 2017 (UTC)