Talk:Citation graph
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Citation network page were merged into Citation graph on January 25 2021. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Merger proposal
editI propose that Citation Network be merged into this page, Citation Graph. These names are synonyms for the same object and while the Citation Network is probably a more popular name at present, I think the Citation Graph page is better set up. It would be easy to merge the small amount of content from the Citation Network page into the Graph page. This would automatically set up a redirect from one to the other. Playerwithgraphs (talk) 09:34, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Cleaning up and fixing references
editJust performed a merge from citation network so this article is poorly organized at the moment. I also notice that one of the references is just a quote from a different paper, so that should be fixed as well. Please remind me if I forget to return to this later. Moonjail (talk) 18:20, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- As some restructuring is in order to meet MOS:LAYOUT, I think there's an opportunity for more useful section headings. Seems to me most of the material here could be placed in one of "Background," "Implementation," "Applications" or "See also". Even these may not all be strictly necessary. May do this tomorrow. Moonjail (talk) 09:11, 27 January 2021 (UTC)