 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Work to be done.
editThis article is weird, for a start the fact that the car was facelifted is only mentioned once in passing, but there are many other problems. there are weird modifyng ideas, and the over use of "By modern Standards", yet this car is only one generation old and thus still reasonably modern. It also seems to have been written solely from a UK point of view and misses off alot about special editions, notably the LHD only Bic special edition which marked an important aniversary for bic.(Morcus (talk) 15:38, 15 July 2009 (UTC)) Also is the Info about the auto true? Why would a company use a 3 speed auto in 97? I had a 205 from 1990 with an engine related to the one noted here and I had 4 speeds (And my car went faster than the suppossed top speed for the saxo auto.(Morcus (talk) 15:40, 15 July 2009 (UTC))
It wasn't built in Vigo, Spain.
editThis model wasn't built in Vigo, Spain. http://www.vigo.psa-peugeot-citroen.com/index.php?id=203 87.221.72.174 (talk) 15:27, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
- Where you are sure of your ground, and especially where you can quote a plausible source, there's nothing to stop you entering the correction. Except that now I've done it. Regards Charles01 (talk) 17:03, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Citroën Saxo électrique
editI have seen an electric version of the Saxo parked outside our house (in Norway). Seems it is mentioned at the Citroën Berlingo électrique page. Searching for "citroen saxo electric" and "citroen saxo electrique" gives quite a few hits. --V79 (talk) 08:09, 4 August 2010 (UTC)