Talk:City Pages

Latest comment: 16 years ago by SusanLesch in topic Edits by 71.34.37.49

Edits by 71.34.37.49

edit

The edits by 71.34.37.49, which essentially delete the list of staff and list of awards are something that needs to be done. That entire list should be condensed down into a few sentences. -- Marumari 17:25, 12 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Good idea. Maybe you can add them. I added only today's news. -SusanLesch (talk) 03:10, 11 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:St. Paul Pioneer Press front page.jpg

edit
 

Image:St. Paul Pioneer Press front page.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:39, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yo, fuggedaboutit, BcB! A fair-use rationale for the image's use at St. Paul Pioneer Press has since been provided. I've also removed the image from the template transcluded here, because that use violates WP:NFC. Hakuna Matata! - Tobogganoggin talk 06:06, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply